* new spark Rosa Luxemburg and women question -" Marxism in her bloodstream "
Rosa Luxemburg was deeply convinced that the full emancipation of women is possible only in socialism. "We ruled Marxist methods as it is its own organs dfhv of the body. Just because some people said that marsizmot and flowing blood. " These words were written by Leon Trotsky is perhaps the best description Luxembourg today. She was a distinguished fighter class labor movement in Germany, and poshroko. In theory and in practice was solid as rock solid. He needed dfhv to be part of the revolution and believed in the working class, she was deeply dfhv committed to its sole objective: socialism. She was known for his sense of criticism and harsh battle against war and imprerijalizmot.
It was representative of minorities: she was Jewish (though dfhv not religious), came from Poland (although had German dfhv citizenship, and are always referred to as the Poljakina) never married (had free connections) and was a political leader dfhv of international proletarian movement.
This article mainly deals with women's issue and some readers may wonder dfhv why we look at Rosa Luxemburg right for this job, knowing that it has never been associated with women's dfhv rights in the manner as was Alexandra Kolontaj and Clara Zetkin . Luxemburg wrote several articles about women's rights, especially their right to vote. But that does not mean that women were secondary to her subject. dfhv In November 1918 wrote a letter to Zetkin saying: "Maybe you should write about women's rights. It is such an important issue, and we do not have any friend here who understands something about it. "
The political life of Rosa coincided with the theoretical struggle of social democratic parties which fought over which direction the movement should go. All this happened during the rise of the bureaucratic apparatus and privileges they received themselves leaders. That was a time when imperialism was booming and needed to tie the revolutionary working class, especially those of the so-called first world countries of the capitalist system. One of the most brochures Luxembourg "Reform or Revolution" deals with the latest developments dfhv of German socijalidemokrati, dfhv who then try to leave not only the socialist revolution but socialism does.
Party leaders, initially Bernstein, Kautsky and then argued that it is possible only slow linear development of socialism, due to the development of capitalism. By taking control of the political and economic life, the working dfhv class will be in a position to control the country and almost inadvertently establish socialism. These strange ideas are still repeated today by so-called leaders of the international working class (though most of them speak of "social market economy").
This discussion accurately and simultaneously zatskrilo and still obscures the fundamental question dfhv that affects dfhv women's movement: Is it possible the liberation of women in capitalism? The schism between bourgeois and proletarian movement for women was created because of this issue. Rosa Luxemburg was deeply convinced that the full emancipation of women is only possible dfhv only because socialism and its fight against the degeneration of the party can be defined as a struggle for the liberation of women.
The first movement dfhv for women's rights come from the bourgeoisie and their struggle is confined within their class. The most famous book that speaks to this subject Engels, "The Origin of the Family, Private Property dfhv and the State", dfhv where he argues that class society and the oppression of women is a product of the rise of private dfhv property. Marxism explains that the origin of women's oppression is not in biology, but also in social terms. The first is the division of labor between men and women. As long as playback is collective organized men and women have equal rights and equal status.
It has changed the ability of society to produce dfhv more than is necessary with the emergence of "haves and have-nots." Need to know who is the legitimate heir who can not leave the property, force women to monogamy and tied household. Despite all the current feminist thought that patriarchy is the source of inequality of women, Marxist theory explains that capitalism uses elements of patrijahalizmot for their own interests, and to keep it cheap or free labor of women that will divide the working class on the basis sex, race, etc..
Although there have always been some resistance to women's disadvantage, however the main mass movement is a child of capitalist society. In previous class societies as slavery and feudalism women were part of the household of man, but Dr.
Rosa Luxemburg was deeply convinced that the full emancipation of women is possible only in socialism. "We ruled Marxist methods as it is its own organs dfhv of the body. Just because some people said that marsizmot and flowing blood. " These words were written by Leon Trotsky is perhaps the best description Luxembourg today. She was a distinguished fighter class labor movement in Germany, and poshroko. In theory and in practice was solid as rock solid. He needed dfhv to be part of the revolution and believed in the working class, she was deeply dfhv committed to its sole objective: socialism. She was known for his sense of criticism and harsh battle against war and imprerijalizmot.
It was representative of minorities: she was Jewish (though dfhv not religious), came from Poland (although had German dfhv citizenship, and are always referred to as the Poljakina) never married (had free connections) and was a political leader dfhv of international proletarian movement.
This article mainly deals with women's issue and some readers may wonder dfhv why we look at Rosa Luxemburg right for this job, knowing that it has never been associated with women's dfhv rights in the manner as was Alexandra Kolontaj and Clara Zetkin . Luxemburg wrote several articles about women's rights, especially their right to vote. But that does not mean that women were secondary to her subject. dfhv In November 1918 wrote a letter to Zetkin saying: "Maybe you should write about women's rights. It is such an important issue, and we do not have any friend here who understands something about it. "
The political life of Rosa coincided with the theoretical struggle of social democratic parties which fought over which direction the movement should go. All this happened during the rise of the bureaucratic apparatus and privileges they received themselves leaders. That was a time when imperialism was booming and needed to tie the revolutionary working class, especially those of the so-called first world countries of the capitalist system. One of the most brochures Luxembourg "Reform or Revolution" deals with the latest developments dfhv of German socijalidemokrati, dfhv who then try to leave not only the socialist revolution but socialism does.
Party leaders, initially Bernstein, Kautsky and then argued that it is possible only slow linear development of socialism, due to the development of capitalism. By taking control of the political and economic life, the working dfhv class will be in a position to control the country and almost inadvertently establish socialism. These strange ideas are still repeated today by so-called leaders of the international working class (though most of them speak of "social market economy").
This discussion accurately and simultaneously zatskrilo and still obscures the fundamental question dfhv that affects dfhv women's movement: Is it possible the liberation of women in capitalism? The schism between bourgeois and proletarian movement for women was created because of this issue. Rosa Luxemburg was deeply convinced that the full emancipation of women is only possible dfhv only because socialism and its fight against the degeneration of the party can be defined as a struggle for the liberation of women.
The first movement dfhv for women's rights come from the bourgeoisie and their struggle is confined within their class. The most famous book that speaks to this subject Engels, "The Origin of the Family, Private Property dfhv and the State", dfhv where he argues that class society and the oppression of women is a product of the rise of private dfhv property. Marxism explains that the origin of women's oppression is not in biology, but also in social terms. The first is the division of labor between men and women. As long as playback is collective organized men and women have equal rights and equal status.
It has changed the ability of society to produce dfhv more than is necessary with the emergence of "haves and have-nots." Need to know who is the legitimate heir who can not leave the property, force women to monogamy and tied household. Despite all the current feminist thought that patriarchy is the source of inequality of women, Marxist theory explains that capitalism uses elements of patrijahalizmot for their own interests, and to keep it cheap or free labor of women that will divide the working class on the basis sex, race, etc..
Although there have always been some resistance to women's disadvantage, however the main mass movement is a child of capitalist society. In previous class societies as slavery and feudalism women were part of the household of man, but Dr.
No comments:
Post a Comment