Since 14-11-2013 newspapers commenting on the full sentence in which judges concluded that liabilit

I realize that this post I earn my enmity and misunderstanding. But I think that when you publish must give opinion on current issues. And these days has become much talk Prestige, the conclusion of the trial.
All disasters are predictable? Not all and not always. History is full of situations of human struggle against the great catastrophe. Earthquakes -San Francisco-, -Pompeia- eruptions, tsunamis -Indonèsia-, and many others. How do you fight? Away from where historically there has been already some disaster evacuations are temporary or permanent; trying to predict the magnitude of the disaster and artificial barriers designed to prevent the catastrophic results: walk in cooler freezer combo earthquake-resistant buildings, seawalls and breakwaters or artificial antitsunami; and, in the long term, trying to attack the causes of catastrophic phenomena: an attempt to halt the possible warming of the planet walk in cooler freezer combo globlal generator unpredictable weather disasters, by way of reducing the consumption of fossil fuels.
Rupture of an old boat full of fuel is obviously a natural disaster. But in some respects, there is a similarity. We can not get away from the disaster; We can build barriers to stop it, and we can attack walk in cooler freezer combo the causes of the disaster. But the issue that concerns me here and is concerned about the liability.
Since 14-11-2013 newspapers commenting on the full sentence in which judges concluded that liability can not be attributed to any of the defendants, who had been reduced to three: the captain, the chief engineer and former CEO Merchant Marine. It was evident walk in cooler freezer combo that the trial would end well, and without having seen what the media say, I agree. walk in cooler freezer combo And why was obvious? Why are judged criminal liability on a broken boat. What happened then was the result, but not the subject of the trial.
Did the Spanish government had any direct responsibility for the accident? I think obviously not. It was a boat traveling along a route where I could loop, loaded with a legal matter, and what had happened revisions. Can you predict whether a vessel is broken? A boat has no expiration date, as there is an age from which a person should stop driving. The revisions are what determine if a boat can sail. The boat was in very poor condition, had been repaired many times and made his last trip. He had passed the certification of repairs that made the company ABS, very little rigorous evidence according to all, as we learned walk in cooler freezer combo later. But at that time no one knew, or they could not do anything. The responsibility that seems to do the certification has not been tried.
Once started the accident, which was the best option? If there had been a haven port available, there was no doubt what to do: take the boat there. But there was no refuge harbor. You could decide to sacrifice walk in cooler freezer combo a whole river, leaving walk in cooler freezer combo the ship sank there, but who makes that decision?
Reader, imagine that you have to make the decision. In Catalonia there must be a port haven? Where: Barcelona, Tarragona, Palamos ...? Can you define yourself? Perhaps walk in cooler freezer combo it should have been decided before a port-haven, but ten years later have still not decided haven port, and there were two governments of different political party. If now there is a new accident, liability would -penal- previous and current governments?
Initially we doubted what to do, and the boat took some laps in front of the Galician coast before he tows offshore. Involved, discussions between the captain, who wanted to save the ship anchored cargo (11 million) walk in cooler freezer combo and maritime authorities, who wanted to remove the ship. Captain disobedience is precisely the origin of the sentence has ended getting disobedience. Hesitation and delayed decision-two days- might have been a basis for criminal responsibility for more and not just political, but the judges did not consider that. The option of sending the ship to sea was less risky when compared with other options, as was transvassar load another ship (which was not there, and there was storm); or bomb the boat sank so quickly.
I'm not technical Marines, have taken the same decision was taken: "Bring the boat as far as possible immediately." This ensures that the effects get more diluted. The Portuguese authorities did the same and put a frigate to the limit of its territorial waters to prevent it from entering the vessel towed